Tuesday, February 14, 2012

TimeToast, An Online Timeline Maker

The other day I received an email from my son's teacher announcing that he had an upcoming assignment that would count as a test grade. Here is the assignment:

Students will be in groups of 3 and are required to choose two important dates and events per chapter. One cardboard poster board per group, and students must be creative with their timeline and going way out there by adding pop ups, cool items and pictures that relate to their event. Students will present to the class.

The teachers at this particular campus require students to use poster board for all kinds of assignments. I am tired of these assignments because I don't even know what the teacher means by "pop ups" and "cool items." I decided to email the teacher and ask if my son's group could use an online timeline to do their project. After 3 emails he agreed that that would be acceptable. Once he agreed, I had to find a good online timeline tool. I found one at TimeToast. It allows the student to add time spans and events. In this case it was possible to add a time span for each of three units in the textbook that covered these 13 chapters. The students could then add events including images, text, and links to Web sites that provided much more detail for their presentation and future study.

Here is an example of how technology integration deepens the student's understanding of a subject. Instead of just finding events in the textbook and adding them to a poster board timeline, I was requiring students to find Websites that contained information about the event. The activity of finding the web sites meant that the students were going to have to read a lot more about the events than could ever be contained in an American history textbook. Students would then have to evaluate the validity of each web site. Also as part of the activity, I suggested that the students should give a reason for each of the events that they chose. This forced them to evaluate the significance of each event.

What I thought was particularly effective was that once the timeline had been created online, students in the entire class would have access to a study guide for all three units.

Here is a sample of what can be done.

Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Whether to use a Shot Gun or a Rifle

One of the problems that keeps us from achieving our goal to integrate technology into the classroom is that we too often use a shot gun approach in our training. By that I mean that every time a new technology begins to emerge we throw it at our teachers in the hope that maybe someone can use it. The problem is that our teachers soon become overwhelmed and don't know what is or is not important. All our teachers hear is blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Here is just a partial list of what has been thrown at teachers in my district during the last few years:

Atomic Learning, Epsilen, Zimbra, GroupWise, gMail, Live@edu, ePals, unitedStreaming, iMovie, Windows Movie Maker, Garage Band, Aviary, Animoto, Edmoto, Moodle, Excel, Word, PowerPoint, Google Docs, Google Sites, Weebly, Eduphoria, Edusoft, iStation, vMath, Education City, ScanTec, Computer Learning Month, IGPro, TEAMS Gradebook, SmartBoards, T3 Grant, digital video cameras, digital cameras, Audacity, iSpring, iNova, Prezi, iPads, iTouch, iTunes, NovaNet, E2020, Plato, digital document cameras, digital projectors, Internet Explorer, Firefox, Safari, NetTrekker, Yahoo, Google, Blogger, Word Press, Ning, Kidspiration, Inspiration, Bubbl.us, Wikispaces, EasyTech, ConnectedTech ...etc.

 Now I realize that part of this is a necessary evil because of the nature of technology and how rapidly it is changing. BUT, there is a lot of rabbit chasing and wasted money as well. I have a standing joke with my trainers that as a district we will swallow anything as long as it costs at least $250,000; $500,000 or $2 million is even better. It is insane madness. I also realize that not every teacher is being assaulted with every one of these technologies. Some of these technologies and promotions are worthwhile and others are not. As a whole, however, we miss the target of getting the technology into the hands of our students to achieve academic goals because we are too busy chasing after nonsense. We can't hit the target because we act like we are blindfolded and firing a shotgun mindlessly in every direction.

Is there a solution to this problem? Yes, there is. We need to take off the blindfold, put down the shotgun, and pick up a rifle, take aim, and fire. How do you do that? You begin with the curriculum. Many of the technologies listed above are worthwhile (many are not), but the question is "How does a technology help a student reach an academic goal?" If a math teacher wants his/her students to use a spreadsheet to calculate or project the results of a bake sale, then the teacher and students need to learn how to insert formulas in a spreadsheet. If a language arts teacher wants to teach her students how to brain storm a topic for an essay or develop an outline, then a tool like Kidspiration, Inspiration, or Bubbl.us would be a good choice. The point is that you use the tools in a practical hands-on approach that targets a specific objective in the classroom. The teacher immediately sees the value of the tool, and resistance begins to melt away. The teacher focuses on the tool that will help him and his students.

Timing is also critical. The training should be closely tied to the time when a specific lesson will be taught. If you are doing a training in September that won't be used until March, then the training is not relevant. You can't go deer hunting when it's not deer season (just to keep the metaphor alive).

A teacher's time is valuable. We need to respect that. Let them pick up the rifle and throw the shotgun and the blindfold away.

Thursday, August 5, 2010

To Filter or Not to Filter

Yesterday, I was training at a SW Podstock conference. The conference was held at a neighboring school district. The campus is relatively new and is equipped with the latest technology. However, as I began setting up for my class, I noticed that the filtering restrictions were much more limiting than what I am used to. Now you need to understand that my basic philosophy is that when in doubt a site ought to be unblocked. For example, I believe that YouTube should be unblocked in my school district, even though as Dean Shareski, a digital educator, thinker, and lecturer with the University of Regina in Saskatchewan, Canada, stated in the keynote address, 99% is garbage. But that 1% is useful and so ubiquitous (aren't you impressed) that I believe it should be opened. Now back to my complaining about the filtering in this school district. I expected YouTube to be blocked. That is pretty standard in most school districts. However, in this district all streaming video is blocked. I also noticed that my Dropbox account was not working. (This was critical for me because this was one of the places where I had saved my presentation for that day.) Gmail was blocked. A lot of popular educational sites were blocked.

Now I know that many administrators are in the protect your tail end at all costs mentality, but there comes a point when you have to ask yourself, how far is this going to go? And if we are not going to use the technology, why are we spending billions of dollars to get it into our schools? Maybe we should just sell it and save the taxpayers a lot of money.

I don't think that is the best solution for our students, but what is a constructive approach to allowing our students to use the technology? Angela Haynes, a conference presenter from Northwest ISD, Roanoke, Texas, asked her principal why all these sites were being blocked in her district. He said that they were dangerous. Angela responded by saying that she hands out a pair of scissors to her 2nd grade students all the time and the scissors are dangerous and pose a possible threat to her students. She went on to explain that she is responsible for monitoring the students so that they don't hurt themselves or others. She is also responsible for teaching the students how to use the scissors properly. Now why can't we be just as sensible in our approach to allowing students to use technology? First, we make clear what is acceptable and unacceptable to do on the web. Second, we monitor the students carefully to make sure that they are not viewing inappropriate materials and are on task. Finally, if they persist in viewing inappropriate sites, they lose their privileges to use the technology.

One last thing.... Whenever students use computers, they should have an instructional purpose for being there. If students are bored, then they are going to get into trouble. That is just a part of human nature. Teachers cannot use computers to baby sit their students. The teacher must be well prepared to extend the lesson for those students who finish early. Give them the guidance they need. Vary the tools and make learning fun.

Wednesday, July 28, 2010

Moodle, a tool to leverage technology integration

I have been aware of Moodle as a platform for creating online course materials for several years now. However, it has only been about a year since I began actually using it to create online content for professional development. What impresses me about this program other than it is free, is that it so easily lends itself to technology integration. For the most part, when an assignment is made, it requires a student to use technology to create, produce, research, share, collaborate, or communicate to complete the assignment.  That means that the student will be "using technology to achieve academic goals."

Up until now I was not sure about how to help high school teachers to get a handle on integrating technology into the curriculum. However, I think Moodle is one part of the solution. [Even as I say this, I am reminded that Mary Cooch (Moodle Fairy) has written a book entitled Moodle 1.9 for Teaching 7-14 Year Olds: Beginner's Guide. It can be ordered at https://www.packtpub.com/beginners-guide-moodle-1-9-for-teaching-7-14-year-olds/book. This book is well written and an excellent resource for using Moodle to create online course work for both elementary and middle school students.]  Using this tool may be yet another way to hook our teachers into technology integration. 

Now I am sure that some teachers are wondering why they would use an online course management system when they meet with their students everyday. One good reason is that current research seems to link the use of online learning to improved student achievement. 
"Students in online learning conditions performed better than those receiving face-to-face instruction. The difference between student outcomes for online and face-to-face classes... was larger in those studies contrasting conditions that blended elements of online and face-to-face instruction with conditions taught entirely face-to-face."   Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning
 For me Moodle is just another tool in the arsenal for leveraging teachnology (I know I misspelled the word. I did it accidentally, but I kind of like it.) into the curriculum. In the coming weeks I will share other approaches on how I am working to get our teachers to jump on board.

Monday, July 19, 2010

Diigo a Social Bookmarking Tool for Education

Getting teachers to allow their students to use technology to achieve academic goals is a challenge (my definition of technology integration.). Every now and then I run across a tool that is so good that many teachers will recognize its worth immediately. Technology tools in and of themselves are usually not transformative of educational practices. However, I believe that Diigo is just one of those tools.

Diigo is a social bookmarking site. I have known about Diigo for quite some time, but until recently I hadn't realized how powerful an educational  tool it really is. It is possible to highlight and annotate web pages and share those annotations with others. You can also sign up for an educator's account and create accounts for all your students. What a great tool for student research projects, collaboration among students, and project based learning! If you looked at my last blog entry, I included an annotated version of Thomas Paine's Common Sense. Check it out.

Here are two websites that will give you more information on this subject.
Two Uses of Technology to Improve Literacy and Critical Thinking

Teaching Social Bookmarking with Diigo Education

Saturday, July 10, 2010

Religious Implications of Global Citizen First

Here is another question that was posed about the global first initiative, "Have you considered the question from a religious perspective?"

The religious question in this is quite interesting. Thomas Paine in his pamphlet Common Sense wrote, "government even in its best state is but a necessary evil in its worst state an intolerable one." Paine went on to write that the design and end of government was to provide security and freedom. In other words Paine believed in limited government that should interfere in the lives of people as little as possible. What is fascinating about Paine's view is that even though he was a deist, he used the Bible to show that God "disapproved of government by kings." To prove his point he referred to two incidents in the history of Israel, a nation that had no king at this time. The first incident was the victory of Israel over the Midianites led by Gideon. Following that battle, the people wanted to make Gideon king. Paine points out that "Gideon in the piety of his soul replied, I will not rule over you, neither shall my son rule over you, THE LORD SHALL RULE OVER YOU. Words need not be more explicit; Gideon doth not decline the honor but denieth their right to give it; neither doth he compliment them with invented declarations of his thanks, but in the positive stile of a prophet charges them with disaffection to their proper sovereign, the King of Heaven."

The second incident happened about 130 years later when the people of Israel came to the prophet Samuel and demanded a king. Paine writes, "But the thing displeased Samuel when they said, give us a king to judge us; and Samuel prayed unto the Lord, and the Lord said unto Samuel, Hearken unto the voice of the people in all that they say unto thee, for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, THEN I SHOULD NOT REIGN OVER THEM....Now therefore hearken unto their voice, howbeit, protest solemnly unto them and show them the manner of the king that shall reign over them."

This demonstrates the mindset of many of our founding fathers and their views toward limited government, and how they would cringe at the thought of adding another layer of government. By the way, you can read my Diigo annotated web page of Thomas Paine's Common Sense by clicking on this link: Diigo Common Sense.

The second intersection with religion relates to biblical prophecy and the creation of a world government. (Note: Rischard does not say that he is in favor of a world government. However, in order to create these GIN panel of experts, one would have to create a bureaucracy that would support these panels, including some kind of enforcement mechanism.) Many Christians believe that towards the end of time as we know it, a world leader will emerge (referred to as the antichrist) and create havoc on the earth. For at least one viewpoint on this issue, you can read the following article: Bible Prophesy and World Government.

These are just two of the ways that this issue can be looked at from a religious perspective. This is certainly not a comprehensive look at the subject.

Friday, July 9, 2010

What Does Global Awareness and Cooperation Look Like?

Here are some questions asked by one educator after viewing my rants against the global citizen first movement. "How can we support teachers in making the connections for these [global] collaborations? How can we look at our curriculum and determine where these types of collaborative conversations fit well and support the learning taking place in our schools?" These are good questions, and I will try to give you a concrete example of how to get a handle on some of these global issues and support our teachers.

Another of Rischard's 20 global crises is deforestation particularly the destruction of tropical rain forests. How do we stop a country like Costa Rica from destroying its tropical rain forests? These forests are important for many reasons including the number of medicinal drugs that come from plants in these rain forests.
Check out this site: Welcome to the Rain Forest.

There is a technology integrated lesson plan that comes from EasyTech (adopted Technology Applications TEKS curriculum in the El Paso Independent School District) called Bake Sale Spreadsheet. One of the introductory activities to this math lesson plan is to read a chapter from the book It's Our World Too! by Phillip Hoose entitled "Founders of the Children's Rain Forest," pp. 83-93. It tells the story of how "forty first and second grade students from a small school in Sweden became upset when their teacher told them that rain forests were being destroyed rapidly throughout the world. They wondered what they -- so young, so few, and so far away from the tropics -- could do that could really matter. Their answer has helped to preserve rain forests around the world." What the children decided to do was raise money to buy rain forest land in Costa Rica to preserve these forests. You can check out their story here: Dream the Forest Wild.

From this introductory activity, the lesson plan calls for students to create a bake sale spreadsheet to calculate how much money they could raise. Of course, the extension for this lesson suggests that students actually do a project to raise money for saving the rain forests or some other worthy cause. Here is a handle to help our students to develop global awareness and support our teachers in this effort. Notice that we are using the tools of technology to help our students achieve these academic goals. Also notice that a GIN panel of global experts was not needed to come up with a solution  to the crisis or to pressure these students to act. What we need are globally aware citizens of sovereign states to step up to the plate. It is our responsibility as educators to help our students become globally aware, NOT to indoctrinate them in the political mindset to become Global Citizens First!